It is quite the opposite in my experience and I've Very different from the strange image being painted here of a Say it's worth the wait (sorry for the pun). Luckily I don't have any significant speed issues but I would definitely The quality of raw conversion in LR4 is head and shouldersĪbove anything else I have seen and the built-in soft-proofing is genius. I don't want to get into a side-by-side comparisson BUT if the government of your country would be performing business the way Adobe is doing things now, I think there would have been riots on the streets a long time ago. Like it was mentioned before, it is a bit disturbing that Adobe employees only pop up here and there to "moderate" but never to inform. ![]() but no gas (and no gas station anywhere to be seen). I really believe that Adobe decided to release an unbaked software because it has to be done before X (X being the release of Cyberlink Photo Director) As much as I like some of the features in LR4, well, it's like Adobe didn't actually implemented them since I cannot use it! I feel almost like having a long empty street and a Ferrari. I was pleasently impressed by Corel Aftershoot Pro and I find myself playing with it more and more. I have tried all the them except for Darktable (I run a Win gig) (either the full version or the trial version). Cyberlink Photo Director (Paid Win/Mac) Corel Aftershoot Pro (Paid - Free Win/Mac/Linux). In case you want a list (I posted one somewhere else but it got buried in the "only last 15 posts are shown) Besides that, the thought of using a DNG converter (free) or even using LR4 as a mere DNG converter, that is very sad. First, you are only getting more and more tied to Adobe (I stopped DNG conversion altogether since some of the alternatives do not work well or at all with DNGs). It was suggested to shoot RAW and then convert to DNG and then use 3.6. Nice interface, (maybe not as elegant as LR, but IT WORKS!). I am getting familiar with Corel After Shot Pro. There are a few that are highly praised by reviewers. Unless you start considering any of the competitor's alternatives to LR. I have no idea where mine is or how to find it.Īm I just screwed until adobe fixes the issues with LR 4 and the nikon D4 compatibility? Do I have to shoot with my lesser D700 till then?īasically yes, you are screwed. There has been a lot of discussion about cache size and location. So now I have this sweet camera and new LR software and I feel like I'm in the dark ages. ![]() I found a workaround with a free download called Sofortbild, or something like that, for my D700, but alas it doesn't recognize the D4 either. I can't shoot tethered with this camera either. Waiting for each image to "focus" to edit takes way too long, as do the rest of the adjustments. I've been using LR since version 1 and using LR4 with these new files (yes, RAW, of course RAW) is unbearably slow in every way. ![]() I have about 50,000 images in my catalog (I'm unclear on whether that matters or not in terms of speed). I had to upgrade to LR4 because LR3 won't open the files shot with my new Nikon D4, which I had to purchase after all my equipment was stolen in December, so it made sense to get the newest and best camera I could afford. Here is what I'm hoping to get answers for: I'm a professional photographer, and nowhere near the tech level of most of the people I'm listening to on this forum. Okay all "oneupping aside", I am back to my basic question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |